Obama
born in Kenya cannot be US President
Breaking News July 29, 2010
Globe Magazine Obama born in Kenya
President was not born in the United
States. He is a Usurper and has broken the “Oath to the Constitution.”
1.
Presidency is illegal
2.
NO Birth Certificate
3.
Government Official tells all
Old Source:
http://www.globemagazine.com/story/277
Current Source:
Obama Under Fire! - Globe Magazine -
6:05pm
Obama’s attempt to be President is the biggest “HOAX” in the history of our country,
in over 230 years! Obama was born in Kenya and therefore, is only a …
http://www.globemagazine.com/story/286
Judges
evade Obama birth-certificate query
July
26th, 2010
Judges on
the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals suddenly have abandoned plans to assess
damages against an attorney whose clients are challenging Barack Obama’s
eligibility to be president after he argued that if there was to be punishment,
he would have the right to know whether the defendants could have mitigated
their injury by publicly releasing Obama’s birth documentation.
The decision
came from Judge Dolores Sloviter in the Kerchner vs. Obama case handled by
attorney Mario Apuzzo. The court had ordered Apuzzo to explain why defense
costs shouldn’t be assessed against him for the “frivolous” appeal.
However, her
newest order denied Apuzzo’s request to reconsider the case and stated “based
on Mr. Apuzzo’s explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on
standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause.”
The case was
filed against Obama, Congress and others just before Obama was sworn into
office, arguing that Obama was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen.
See the
movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this
unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!
“We further
contend that Obama has failed to even conclusively prove that he is at least a
‘citizen of the United States’ under the Fourteenth Amendment as he claims by
conclusively proving that he was born in Hawaii,” the lawsuit claims.
Apuzzo
represents Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James
Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.
Named as
defendants are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, the
House of Representatives, former Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi.
The case
alleges Congress failed to follow the Constitution, which “provides that
Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College
Electors.”
The district
court rejected the case based on issues of “standing” and never addressed the
core issues presented. The appellate court did the same.
But Apuzzo
had explained to the court that under standard rules of judicial procedure,
while they allow for damages to be assessed in “frivolous” cases – even though
the district never made that ruling – there also is a responsibility on the
part of the defendants to mitigate their damages.
In
this case, he asked the court to “enforce my right to discover whether
defendants had a copy of the [certificate of live birth, Obama's] 1961
long-form birth certificate, and related documents showing that Obama was born
in Hawaii which they could have simply shared [with] … the Kerchner
plaintiffs.”
He said had
those actions taken place and the documents been provided, the plaintiffs
“would not have come into existence.”
That
disclosure, he argued, “would have mitigated the damages and costs they now
claim they suffered from having to defend plaintiffs’ appeal.”
“To
confirm the veracity of the defendants’ representations, I also have a right
under (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) 26(a)(1) and 26(b)(1) to receive a
copy of those documents,” he argued. “Should the court be inclined to find
that I am liable for defendants’ damages and costs, I also request that the
court defer entering judgment on damages and costs until I have had an
opportunity to address the amount of damages claimed by defendants, the issue
of proximate cause, and whether defendants satisfied their burden to mitigate
those damages.
“So that I
may have a meaningful opportunity to present defenses to defendants’ claim of
damages and costs, including showing that defendants have failed to mitigate
their claimed damages, I
am requesting limited discovery of Obama’s (certificate of live birth), his
1961 long-form birth certificate, and any documents that may be relevant in
showing where Obama was born, along with a hearing on the
record at which I will have a fair opportunity to present witnesses, evidence
and defenses to the defendants’ claim of damages and costs,” he wrote.
The court’s response was to drop the “Order to Show Cause”
almost immediately, referencing only Apuzzo’s “research.”
Apuzzo told
WND the case, which now is being prepared for the U.S. Supreme Court, probably
was impacted by his explanation of his rights and his suggestion a simple
disclosure of Obama’s birth documentation could have resolved the issue and
“mitigated” the defendants’ claimed damages.
He also said
it’s essential to obtain a decision from the highest court in the land,
because, of the multitude of cases that have been brought over the eligibility
issue, virtually none has addressed the question itself. All have been decided
on “standing” or other side issues.
“Only the
Supreme Court can decide the issue in the context of Article 2 standing,” he
said.
He explained
Obama can claim no special privacy rights to his birth documentation since his
campaign already has posted online an image of a “Certification of Live Birth,”
a document critics say was available to children not born in Hawaii at the
time. Documents supporting the birth certificate also should be public, Apuzzo
argued.
Barry Soetoro a.k.a. Barack Obama
Exposed...
Barack Obama cannot be the President of
the United States since he was born in Kenya.
Barack Obama where is your U.S. Birth
Certificate?
CNN Lou Dobbs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZSB1XmEYKc&NR=1
Additional Links
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra8SJBEzhxc&feature=email
IN
CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States
of America: But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute
Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government,
and to provide new Guards for their future security. The
Constitution of the United States of America http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
citizens_arrest_when_where_how_and_why_07222010.htm
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of
their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml