AIPAC
Decapitators inside US Government Intelligence Analyst
Breaking News Monday November 26, 2012
Special Notes by Stew Webb Federal
Whistleblower
AIPAC_Officers_and_Board_members_20121127.htm
AIPAC,
decapitators inside US government: Intelligence analyst
By Gordon Duff
—
Seventy hours ago, at this writing,
while on Air Force One, President Barack Obama issued a press release that has
been utterly ignored by the Western Press.
The president has openly announced a move
against violent plotters inside the US government and espionage agents. He does
not use the terms “AIPAC” or “the Israel lobby” but it is highly unlikely he
could be referring to anything else.
In fact, we can think of no other group.
I was privately briefed on some of the
reasons behind this document. On what is known, not “surmised,” I will explain:
There is, currently, within the US
military, the Executive branch of government and among extremist “power
brokers” in America an active plot to “alter” America’s form of government
through “decapitation.”
Let me be clear. Where the memo,
printed in full below, refers to “violent”, it means “assassination” of many
top leaders in America including but not limited to the President, Vice
President, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and others.
The plot makes use of the resources of major
private defense contractors and their intelligence and special operations
personnel. There has been active recruiting that has been noted and is why the
memo was released and why many members of the military have been subjected to
investigation.
The Benghazi attack was planned and
financed by this group.
Many writers in the alternative media have
noted much of what is going on but not all. Some have shown access to very
knowledgeable sources.
Behind the plotters are drug cartels that
have penetrated the US government, former lobbyists who were moved into
government during the Bush (43) administration and now are suspected of being
involved in a coup attempt.
There is no direct evidence tying any foreign
government to this plot though most are “fanatically” aligned with the militant
Likudists in Israel under Netanyahu’s regime.
The President’s text below, unedited:
November 21, 2012
Presidential Memorandum — National
Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat
Programs
Memorandum for the heads of executive
departments and agencies
Subject: National Insider Threat
Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs
This Presidential Memorandum
transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for
Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide
direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat
programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees
who may represent a threat to national security. These threats encompass
potential espionage, violent acts against the
Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified
information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on
interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems.
The Minimum Standards provide
departments and agencies with the minimum elements necessary to establish
effective insider threat programs. These elements include the capability to
gather, integrate, and centrally analyze and respond to key threat-related
information; monitor employee use of classified networks; provide the workforce
with insider threat awareness training; and protect the civil liberties and
privacy of all personnel.
The resulting insider threat
capabilities will strengthen the protection of classified information across
the executive branch and reinforce our defenses against both adversaries and
insiders who misuse their access and endanger our national security.
Barack Obama
A very real threat to world stability
To some, at a glance, this might actually
sound like a response to leaks within the CIA and White House except for some
extraordinary language. Please make very special note of the following:
“…to deter, detect and mitigate
actions by employees who may present a threat to national security…These
threats include…violent acts against the Government and the Nation…”
Please note that they refer to “violent
acts” and speak of both the “government” and “nation.”
By “government,” they are indicting,
with no “wiggle room,” assassination plots.
By “nation,” they may well be
referring to false flag terrorism that may well include use of weapons of mass
destruction. Britain was subject to such a threat during the London Olympics,
one that would never have been successfully overcome without the help of
journalists who put themselves at great risk.
The US government has had a twelve-year
moratorium against arrest and prosecution of spies within our government and
military other than those who can be tied to China.
The most famous Chinese “spy” was Wen Lee Ho, a nuclear scientist at Los Alamos Labs. He was
arrested in 1999, held in solitary confinement for a year and then released.
In order to get an accurate picture I phoned
two friends, one a senior FBI counter-intelligence operative and the other a
very senior US Army intelligence officer.
The question I put before them, while eating
breakfast, was:
“Please list the nations that
represent the greatest threat of espionage against the United States and, which
nations, in order, are believed to represent the “penetration threat” that
President Obama is referring to.”
From the FBI, their appraisal not intended
for the “pop culture” media:
“Our greatest direct threat is Israel
and the Israel lobby. They have systematically penetrated every aspect of
government and the military and, if they cannot get documents from those
branches, friends in congress will give them access to anything that branch has
available. After that is India, with every research facility at risk from RAW
(Indian Intelligence) penetration and then Cuba, Mexico and Turkey.
The primary end users of this
intelligence, the “clients,” are Russia and China.”
From the US Army:
“I agree with Israel and the rest but
we have not had Turkey on our radar. The obvious end users are, of course,
Russia and China based on capability.
The issue I have is how a
presidential press release, an extraordinary and almost “draconian” document
has gone without an uproar from congress and wide press coverage. Who has the
power to suppress reporting on something like this, though, I know that you
will say it is Israel, I would want proof.
Though there has been no official
notification of this, I am of the impression that we now consider any mention
of Israeli spying to be highly classified. Only Russia and China are officially
listed, entirely out of concern not to offend lobbyists whose feelings outweigh
real issues of national security.”
Then I turn on my television, hour after hour
of TV shows about espionage and terrorism. Both American and British TV are the
same.
All spies are from Iran and Pakistan; nations
that our actual intelligence agencies indicate represent no espionage threat to
speak of.
In fact, in my two Saturday morning phone
interviews, which can, of course, be confirmed by Homeland Security who has
tapped my phones, I have reflected with great accuracy. Thus, we ask you to
read what President Obama really did not say “between the lines,” the
message is quite clear.
We do not see a roundup of AIPAC spies, not
like in the early days of the Bush administration although Attorney General
John Ashcroft quashed that investigation.
What we are seeing is a hunt for traitors
within the American government and military, some of which is working its way
onto the news.
The question of the moment, however, is this:
How can a President of the United States
announce that the government is infiltrated with terrorists and spies and no
newspaper, television network or other form of media notices?
All logos and trademarks in this site are
property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.
For more information go
to:www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtm