stewwebb@sierranv.net
AIDS Vaccine Scam Exposed
by JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA
(AP)
Jan 2003
(Editor's note: The holy grail of AIDS research -- an AIDS
vaccine -- is exposed to be a sham. How can you create an "antidote" to a
man-made organism which is constantoly mutating? The Boys at Fort Detrick should
have thought about this before creating the chimera in the first place -- but
they did after all create the "AIDS Industry" and there's plenty of money to be
made.)
Harvard AIDS researchers working with monkeys say the virus
overcame an experimental vaccine by changing a single gene, killing one of the
animals.
Scientists said the disappointment does not mean that AIDS
vaccines are doomed to fail. But it illustrates how the virus remains a
relentless opponent that will not be easily defeated or even contained.
HIV already is known to mutate and grow impervious to standard AIDS
drugs in at least half of all Americans under care for the infection.
Now researchers have seen a similar outcome with an experimental vaccine
that tries to stimulate immune cells to prevent the virus from
multiplying.
The mutation occurred in only one of eight vaccinated rhesus
monkeys in the Harvard experiment.
The findings were published in
Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
``It is sobering to find that a
single-point mutation within the virus can initiate a cascade of events
resulting in a clinical vaccine failure and death,'' said Dan H. Barouch, a
clinical fellow at the Harvard Medical School and lead author of the study.
More than one dozen experimental vaccines using different genetic
strategies have been tested in various laboratories. Some have been successful
for more than two years.
Unlike a flu shot, AIDS vaccines do not
actually prevent infection by stimulating antibody molecules that neutralize the
invading virus. That is because the HIV comes in many strains and it changes
rapidly, overwhelming the antibody response.
Instead, the AIDS vaccines
work to hold HIV infection in check. The vaccines are made with genes that carry
the code for proteins in the virus. When the immune system sees these codes, it
stimulates production of a broad class of virus-fighting cells known as
cytotoxic T lymphocytes, or killer T cells.
Details of one such vaccine
program developed Merck & Co. were published in Nature along with the
Harvard report. Company researchers discussed their progress at the first-ever
AIDS vaccine meeting in September, and they have begun testing the vaccine in
people.
In their animal study, the Merck researchers used the simian
version of HIV. They said their best results were obtained by loading an SHIV
gene for a protein known as gag into a genetically engineered cold virus. It
stimulated the monkeys' immune systems to generate different types of killer T
cells.
The Merck researchers subsequently injected lethal doses of SHIV
into the animals. They said the vaccine has protected the animals and they have
not seen signs of the Harvard problem, known as ``gene-escape.''
``We've
gone 500 days and not seen any escape,'' said molecular biologist Emilio Emini,
director of the Merck trials. ``It's something to watch for. But if the vaccine
elicits a sufficiently broad genetic response, this is going to be an issue that
we can deal with.''
The Harvard trial took a different approach. Rather
than loading the genetic material from SHIV onto a bioengineered cold virus, the
Harvard researchers injected gag DNA plus an immune cell growth factor directly
into the animals. That technique known as a ``naked DNA'' vaccine.
Seven
of Harvard's vaccinated animals have remained healthy for two years, even after
injected with SHIV.
But the eighth vaccinated monkey, known as No. 798,
responded differently. Six months into the trial, molecular studies showed the
virus had started mutating the gag gene in the vaccinated monkey.
Within
eight months, virus levels soared within No. 798 and mutated virus was rapidly
replacing the original virus. Levels of killer T cell levels plummeted. No. 798
died of AIDS-related complications one year after vaccination.
Federal
scientists who reviewed both the Harvard and Merck studies said SHIV strain used
in the trials is very aggressive and hard to control. It may not reflect how
vaccines will perform in humans, where HIV infection is more gradual.
Developing an AIDS vaccine will be ``an uphill grade for the foreseeable
future,'' Jeffery Lifson of the National Cancer Institute and Malcolm Martin of
the National Institutes of Health wrote in an accompanying editorial.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml