BUSH
AND ASSOCIATES FOUND GUILTY OF TORTURE AND WAR CRIMES
Breaking News May 12, 2012
http://www.stewwebb.com/breaking_news.htm
http://www.youtube.com/user/stewwebb1
GUILTY: On the charge of Crime of Torture and War Crimes,
the tribunal finds the accused persons guilty as charged and convicted as war
criminals for Torture and Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment of the
Complainant War Crime Victims.
One of the Lead Prosecutors of the Bush War
Crimes Tribunal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Boyle
http://www.law.illinois.edu/faculty/profile/FrancisBoyle
Time to tell Barack Obama and Eric Holder to
do their Jobs that the American People hired them to do. Put this Punk George W.
Bush in Jail.—Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower
BUSH
AND ASSOCIATES FOUND GUILTY OF TORTURE AND WAR CRIMES
http://www.educideiraq.org/BEYONDEDUCIDE/index.asp?ID=249
KUALA LUMPUR, 11 May 2012 - The five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered a
guilty verdict against former United States President George W. Bush and his
associates at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal hearing that had started on
Monday.
.
photo: President of the Tribunal delivering the judgement
to a packed court room
On the charge of Crime of Torture and War Crimes, the tribunal finds the
accused persons former U.S. President George W. Bush and his associates namely
Richard Cheney, former U.S. Vice President, Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence Secretary, Alberto Gonzales, then Counsel to
President Bush, David Addington, then General Counsel
to the Vice-President, William Haynes II, then General Counsel to Secretary of Defence, Jay Bybee, then
Assistant Attorney General, and John Choon Yoo, former Deputy Assistant Attorney-General guilty as
charged and convicted as war criminals for Torture and Cruel, Inhumane and
Degrading Treatment of the Complainant War Crime Victims.
Earlier in the week, the tribunal heard the testimonies of three witnesses
namely Abbas Abid, Moazzam Begg and Jameelah Hameedi. They related
the horrific tortures they had faced during their incarceration. The tribunal
also heard two other Statutory Declarations of Iraqi citizen Ali Shalal and Rhuhel Ahmed, a
British citizen.
Testimony showed that Abbas Abid,
a 48-year-old chief engineer in the Science and Technology Ministry had his
fingernails removed by pliers. Ali Shalal was
attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from the wall. Moazzam Begg was beaten and put
in solitary confinement. Jameelah was almost nude and
humiliated, used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter. All
these witnesses have residual injuries till today.
These witnesses were taken prisoners and held in prisons in Afghanistan (Bagram), in Iraq (Abu Gharib,
Baghdad International Airport) and two of them namely Moazzam
Begg and Rhuhel Ahmed were
transported to Guantanamo Bay.
In a submission that lasted a day, the prosecution showed in an in depth
submission how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush,
Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld,
aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials –
all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted
norm.
According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses shows a
sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel and dehumanizing course of
conduct against them. These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict
the worst possible pain and suffering.
After hearing the defence of the Amicus Curiae and
the subsequent rebuttal the prosecution, the tribunal ruled unanimously that
there was a prima facie case made out by the prosecution.
After hours of deliberation, the tribunal, in the verdict that was read out by
the president of the tribunal Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin,
found that the prosecution had established beyond a reasonable doubt that the
accused persons, former President George Bush and his co-conspirators engaged
in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that
established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to
commit the crimes of Torture and War Crimes, including and not limited to a
common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War
on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and
Iraq:
(a) Torture;
(b) Creating, authorizing and implementing a regime of Cruel, Inhumane, and
Degrading Treatment;
(c) Violating Customary International Law;
(d) Violating the Convention Against Torture 1984;
(e) Violating the Geneva Convention III and IV 1949;
(f) Violating the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.
(g) Violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations
Charter.
The Tribunal finds that the prosecution has established beyond a reasonable
doubt that the Accused persons are individually and jointly liable for all
crimes committed in pursuit of their common plan and purpose under principles
established by Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal
(the Nuremberg Charter), which states, inter alia, “Leaders, organizers,
instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a
common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes are responsible for all acts
performed by any person in execution of such plan.”
The Principles of the Nuremberg Charter and the Nuremberg Decision have been
adopted as customary international law by the United Nations. The government of
the United States is subject to customary international law and to the
Principles of the Nuremburg Charter and the Nuremburg Decision.
The Tribunal finds that the prosecution has proven beyond reasonable doubt that
the accused lawyers, gave ‘advice’ that “the Geneva Conventions did not apply
(to suspected al Qaeda and Taliban detainees); that there was no torture
occurring within the meaning of the Torture Convention, and that enhanced
interrogations techniques, (constituting cruel, inhumane, and degrading
treatment,) were permissible.”
The prosecution has also established beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused
lawyers “knew full well their advice was being sought to be acted upon, and in
fact was acted upon, and such advice paved the way for violations of
international law, the Geneva Conventions and the Torture Convention.”
The accused lawyers’ advice was binding on the accused Bush, Rumsfeld and
Cheney, each of whom relied on the accused lawyers’ advice. Others, such as CIA
Director George Tenet and Diane Beaver, officer in charge at Guantanamo, relied
on the accused lawyers’ advice. The prosecution had established beyond a
reasonable doubt that the accused lawyers are criminally liable for their acts,
and for participating in a joint criminal enterprise.
The president read that the Tribunal orders that reparations commensurate with
the irreparable harm and injury, pain and suffering undergone by the
Complainant War Crime Victims be paid to the Complainant War Crime Victims.
While it is constantly mindful of its stature as merely a tribunal of
conscience with no real power of enforcement, the Tribunal finds that the
witnesses in this case are entitled ex justitia to
the payment of reparations by the 8 convicted persons and their government.
It is the Tribunal’s hope that armed with the findings of this Tribunal, the
witnesses will, in the near future, find a state or an
international judicial entity able and willing to exercise jurisdiction and to
enforce the verdict of this Tribunal against the 8 convicted persons and their
government. The Tribunal’s award of reparations shall be submitted to the War
Crimes Commission to facilitate the determination and collection of reparations
by the Complainant War Crime Victims.
President Lamin read, “As a tribunal of conscience,
the Tribunal is fully aware that its verdict is merely declaratory in nature.
The tribunal has no power of enforcement, no power to impose any custodial
sentence on any one or more of the 8 convicted persons. What we can do, under
Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala
Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the
Tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the Chief Prosecutor
of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the
Security Council.
The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the
names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the
Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicized accordingly.
The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest
international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these
are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to
institute prosecutions if any of these Accused persons may enter their
jurisdictions.
PROSECUTION’S COMMENT ON THE DECISION IN KL WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL CASE NO
2: CHIEF PROSECUTOR V BUSH, CHENEY, RUMSFELD & 5 OTHERS
The decision today by the KL War Crimes Tribunal has vindicated the integrity
of international law. Its unanimous 5-Judges panel decision has resoundingly -
like the 4 decisions of the US Supreme Court – declared that it is not for the
President of the US to refashion international humanitarian law to suit the
country’s own illegal ends. In particular the decision makes clear that the
President of the US and his cohorts cannot authorise
the infliction of torturous acts – in violation of international law, including
the Convention on Torture and the Geneva Conventions. As the trial showed,
Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, with the support and connivance of their legal
advisors, threw their captives into a legal black hole, locking them for years
in a constitutional limbo. They asserted – but refused to prove – that their
captives were guilty of crimes.And tortured them in
ways that defies belief.
What is the effect of this decision? As the highest UK Court decided
when it refused immunity to Pinochet, the former Chilean President: torture is
a universal crime. It is an international war crime against all of mankind. The
judges there said that international law makes clear that there is no safe
haven for those who carry out or order torture. And that there is an obligation
by States to capture and try war criminals if they enter their countries.
Indeed the courts in some countries – like Spain and Germany – have already
initiated such action.
Now countries will have this conviction – which also so declared - to support
any such action they may wish to take. We must emphasise
that this trial was carried out with scrupulous regard to fairness and justice
on the basis of rules established by the Nuremberg Charter and the
International Criminal Court. Although duly served, the accused chose not to be
represented, and in accordance with rules for international tribunals, a defence team was appointed on their behalf as amici curiae. In addition the memoirs of Bush, Cheney and
Rumsfeld, were supplied and cited to the court – which presented their versions
and justifications of events. In a sense they “spoke” to the Tribunal through
their writings.
How long before war criminals are brought to book? It took many years
before some Nazi war criminals were indicted and finally convicted. Pinochet
was arrested and arraigned before a UK court while in London for medical
treatment some 8 years after he ended his term as President. For some more
powerful persons it may well take longer. But the message is clear: anytime,
anywhere, those convicted today for war crimes, may be similarly arrested and
charged.
Thus may the rule of international law be vindicated.
And justice restored for those they threw into a legal black hole and tortured
so viciously.
Dated at Kuala Lumpur 11 May 2012.
Prof Gurdial Singh Nijar
Chief Prosecutor
KL War Crimes Tribunal
The Kuala Lumpur tribunal press
releases are online on the website of the BRussells
Tribunal
CLICK
HERE
http://www.brussellstribunal.org/KLWarCrimes2012.htm
Read all
about the first hearing of the War Crimes Tribunal in November 2011 |
Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture
KUALA LUMPUR, 11 May 2012 – The five-panel
tribunal unanimously delivered a guilty verdict against former United States
President George W. Bush and his associates at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal hearing that had started on Monday. On the charge of Crime of Torture
and War Crimes, the tribunal finds the accused persons former [...]
KUALA LUMPUR, 10 May 2012 – The fourth day of
the trial began with the submission of the amicus curiae who submitted that
international law changed after World War II and again after 9/11. He said that
Torture is not a crime under international law and customary
international law and jus cogens is no longer
[...]
KUALA LUMPUR, 9 May 2012 – The third day of
the Kuala Lumpur war crimes tribunal hearing saw the prosecution present its
submission to establish that the accused parties are indeed guilty as charged
for the Crime of Torture and Crimes Against Humanity.
In the last two days, three witnesses namely Abbas Abid, Moazzam Begg
[...]
KUALA LUMPUR, 8 May 2012 – The Kuala Lumpur
War Crimes Tribunal heard the testimony of the prosecution’s third witness Jameelah Abbas Hameedi, who used to be the Head Chief of the Cooperation
Unions in Kirkuk. The 57-year-old Iraqi told of her torture in the Baghdad
Airport and Abu Ghraib prisons in 2004. She told
[...]
PRESS RELEASE TRIBUNAL HEARS TWO
VICTIMS TESTIMONY KUALA LUMPUR, 7 May 2012 – The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes
Tribunal commenced hearing the second charge of Crime of Torture and War Crimes
against former U.S. President George W. Bush and his associates namely Richard
Cheney, former U.S. Vice President, Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence
[...]
THE BRUSSELLS
TRIBUNAL - The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal will be hearing the second
charge of Crime of Torture and War Crimes against former U.S. President George
W. Bush and his associates namely Richard Cheney, former U.S. Vice President,
Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence Secretary, Alberto
Gonzales, then Counsel to President Bush, David Addington,
then General [...]
KUALA LUMPUR, 3 May 2012 – The Kuala Lumpur
War Crimes Tribunal will be hearing the second charge of Crime of Torture and
War Crimes against former U.S. President George W. Bush and his associates
namely Richard Cheney, former U.S. Vice President, Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence Secretary, Alberto Gonzales, then Counsel to
President Bush, David [...]
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml