CAN CITIZENS FORM THEIR OWN GRAND JURY AND
INDICT POLITICIANS FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
July 23,
2010
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=4498
By Jim
Frazier
An
organization called the “American Grand Jury.org” has convened a Grand Jury and
indicted President Obama for the crime of treason. Will their indictment be
acknowledged in a U.S. District court of law? Are common citizens able to
indict an elected official?
“Yes,” says
Hal Von Luebbert,” author of “Citizen Power Now.”
“The US government has no power to bring anyone to trial. The government can
NOT find any person guilty of anything. Both of those powers belong to The
People through use of a jury.”
The U.S.
Attorney’s office in Colorado does not agree. “I don’t think any citizen-
convened Grand Jury has power to be enforced in a court of law,” said Jeff Dorschnor, spokesperson for the U.S. Attorneys
office in Denver.
Weld County
District Attorney Ken Buck echoed the same idea. “I’ve never heard of a Grand
Jury called by citizens,” he said.
Mike Saccone, the Colorado Department of Law’s spokesperson,
said, “There are no provisions for formation of citizen grand juries in Colorado.
That is the way the statues stand now.”
Von Lubbuert disagrees. “Our elected officials have lost the
vision of our forefathers. The Bill of Rights is still the supreme law of our
land, and that law provides for indictment only by a Grand Jury composed of
common people. That law provides for conviction only by a Petit Jury, a jury of
your peers. Think about it,” he said. “When you go to a trial, the charges are
brought by “The People.” The jury decides whether you are innocent or
guilty – not the judge. The jury does not have to follow the law. In fact, the
jury can ignore the law and set free an obviously guilty person if they want.
The jury is the final word, not the judge, not the prosecutors. The power to
create freedom belongs to the jury.”
But the
power to convene a Grand Jury is not recognized today in America by most
judges. Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney explains.
“The constitutional power of ‘we the people’ sitting as grand jurors has been
subverted by a deceptive play on words since 1946 when the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure were enacted. Regardless, the power still exists in the
Constitution and has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court.”
Donofrio says the 5th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution provides the power for a Grand Jury of the people without reliance
upon a U.S. Attorney to concur in such criminal charges.
The issue
has been discussed often in legal journals. Roger Roots, writing in the
“Creighton Law Review,” stated: “In theory, the grand jury is a body of independent
citizens that can investigate any crime or government misdeed that comes to its
attention. In practice,
however, the grand jury is dependent upon the prosecutor to bring cases and
gather evidence.
Thus, while
the grand jury still exists as an institution -- in a sterile, watered-down,
and impotent form -- its decisions are the mere reflection of the United States
Justice Department.
The powers
for citizen grand juries have been affirmed by several Supreme Court decisions.
Justice Powell, in United States v. Calandra,
414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974), stated:
"The grand jury's
historic functions survive to this day. Its responsibilities continue to
include both the determination of whether there is probable cause to believe a
crime has been committed and the protection of citizens against unfounded
criminal prosecutions. Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S.
665, 686-687 (1972)."
In United
States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), Justice Scalia, delivering
the opinion of the court, laid down the law of the land:
“'[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history,… the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but
not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned,
therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It
"'is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'"
Robert
Campbell, founder of the American Grand Jury, says that this passage sets the
stage for a revolutionary new FOURTH BRANCH of the Government in the United
States. “Besides, the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches, I submit
that there is a fourth branch, THE GRAND JURY, and "we the people” when
sitting as grand jurors, are, as Scalia quoted in US v. Williams, “a
constitutional fixture in its own right."
He quotes
more of Scalia’s opinion regarding the Grand Jury:
In
fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the
institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the
Government and the people.
“The law is
on our side,” Campbell says. “We the People have the right and power under the
5th Amendment of the Constitution to charge this government with crimes whether
the US Attorneys or the federal judges agree with us. As the Supreme Court has
so brilliantly stated, we are the "buffer between the Government and the
people."
Campbell’s
American Grand Jury team is actively pursuing decisions in a number of United
States District Courts located in multiple jurisdictions including: the
District of Columbia, Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, Kansas, New York, Texas,
California, Arizona, Connecticut, and others.
Campbell says that a federal judge, Royce Lamberth,
U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, has issued two opinions in response to
the filings including the statement that the presentments are constitutionally
permitted…”
For more
information go to www.americangrandjury.org/
To hear more
statements by Hal Von Luebbert go to www.CitizenPowerNow.com
All logos and trademarks
in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml