HOW TO COMBAT ILLEGAL INTERNET TAPS.
Dec. 9, 2002
From:
Stew Webb
Federal Whistleblower
stewwebb@sierranv.net
When your firewall gives a reading of the IP # of the illegal
criminals tapping your computer, simply log onto
www.ARIN.net (Who Is) and find out.
Second do as I am doing and file something similar in
The US District Court.
Most likely it is a CIA-NSA or other Homeland Spook operation, therefore lets all begin flushing these criminal
Nazi's out, and expose them.
I never signed a paper giving up my rights as an American.
Thank You
Stew Webb
********************************************************
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has 'closed', the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. AND I AM CAESAR." --Julius Caesar
*********************************************************
BIBLE: King James Version
ISAIAH 10
(1) WOE UNTO THEM THAT DECREE UNRIGHTEOUS
DECREES, WHICH THEY HAVE PRESCRIBED;
(2) TO TURN ASIDE THE NEEDY FROM JUDGEMENT,
AND TO TAKE AWAY THE RIGHT FROM THE POOR
OF MY PEOPLE, THAT WIDOWS MAY BE THEIR PREY,
AND THAT THEY MAY ROB THE FATHERLESS !
(3) AND WHAT WILL YE DO IN THE DAY OF VISITATION,
AND IN THE DESOLATION WHICH SHALL COME FROM FAR?
TO WHOM WILL YE FLEE FOR HELP?
AND WHERE WILL YE LEAVE YOUR GLORY?
(4) WITHOUT ME THEY SHALL BOW DOWN UNDER THE
PRISONERS, AND THEY SHALL FALL UNDER THE SLAIN.
For all this his anger is not turned away, but his hand is stretched
out still.
(For those in the White House, the Congress, Senate, Judiciary
of America, your day with The Lord will come...)
*********************************************************
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case Number:_________________________
Filed This Date: December 9, 2002
Stewart A. Webb,
And in behalf of
The People Of The United States of America
And the United States Government.
P.O.Box 31052
Las Vegas, Nevada 89173-1052
stewwebb@sierranv.net
Plaintiff,
Vs.
Starnet, Inc.
Internet Reg. # 216.126.136.250
Internet Reg. # 64.24.5.152
Telephone number: 847 963-0116
(Unnamed co-conspirators)
Additional Yet Unnamed Defendants 1-1000 and Co-Conspirators
Defendants,
MOTION FOR HEARING TO PRESENT EVIDENCE
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GRAND JURY
COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Stewart A. Webb, pro se, and moves the District Court to enter orders directing the Federal Grand Jurors to hear allegations and testimony of the Plaintiff and others, (in secret) concerning the above named and Yet unnamed Defendants and their participation in a Continuous Criminal Enterprises, Racketeering Influence Corruption Organization (RICO), Obstruction of Justice, Racketeering and Conspiracy, illegal Internet wiretap, taping
into defendants computer illegally.
(The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals holds that a prosecutor may not prevent a citizen from presenting a complaint to the Grand Jury. "To fulfill its function of protecting individual citizens and providing them with a forum for bringing complaints within the criminal justice system, the Grand Jury must be open to the public for the independent presentation of evidence before it. If the Grand Jury is available only to the prosecuting attorney and all complaints must pass through him, the Grand Jury can justifiably be described as a prosecutorial tool...We therefore hold that, by application to the Circuit Judge, whose duty it is to insure access to the Grand Jury, any person may to the Grand Jury to present a complaint to it."
Furthermore, the Court continues, a prosecutor may not render unsworn testimony in an attempt to dissuade the Grand Jury from hearing the Citizen's evidence. Finally, a writ of prohibition will lie to prevent a prosecutor from attempting to discourage the Grand Jury from hearing the complaint. (Miller v. Smith; W Va Sup Ct App, 12/18/81).
If a U.S./District Attorney fails/refuses to sign and execute a valid Grand Jury Indictment, the Grand Jury can hold that U.S./District Attorney in Contempt and order the Sheriff or Marshals to arrest and hold him in jail until he either signs and executes the Indictment or else resigns his job as U.S./District Attorney (Public Servant). This is the absolute power of the Grand Jury, and the Sheriff/Marshal, as executor of the Grand Jury's will.
NATURE OF CASE AND BACKGROUND FACT
Plaintiff, along with others (numerous witnesses) unnamed at this time, have documentation and evidence from "first person" observation that will show above named Defendants and unnamed Defendants and others have engaged in Continuous Criminal activity for an unspecified period of time and have by actions which are codified in the United States Code as criminal in nature and that have duly been passed by the Congress as Criminal Activity.
Plaintiff requests that a US Federal Citizens Grand Jury be convened at the earliest practical time so that this testimony and presentation of evidence may be offered.
Plaintiff is well apprised of making false statements to a government agency under 18 USC 35, 1001, 2071 and others and demands to bring forth evidence under oath or affirmation as to the substance of these allegations.
Plaintiff wishes to notice the Court and that it would be a MISPRISION OF FELONY under 18 USC 4 to fail to disclose felonious acts that have been witnessed by or that have come to the attention of the Plaintiff.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Plaintiff wishes to bring forth evidence to the Federal Grand Jury concerning crimes, which have been committed against the United States of America and its People. Plaintiff will show through evidence and testimony that various felonious acts have been committed .
Under the Federal Criminal Statues embodied in Several Titles of United States Code Both Civil and Criminal as follows:
In Violations of the following named and unnamed Laws and US Codes:
Please Note: Venue Quo Warranto Government Official refuses to do their jobs.
Numerous Violations of Due Process of Law.
Plaintiffs federal claim arises pursuant to the Federal Whistleblowers Act/Judicial act 31 USC 3729 through 3732.
And the following:
Quo Warranto (Public Servants refuse to do their job)
28 USC 1391
Titles:18 USC 1503 Intimidate a Witness,
18 USC 1510 Obstructing a Criminal Investigation,
18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, Victim or Informant,
18 USC 1512 Engaging in Misleading Conduct
18 USC 1512 (a) (l) (c) Criminalizing the Act of Preventing Communications to Authorities when the Communications relate to the possible commission of Federal Offenses
18 USC 1513 Retaliation against a witness, victim or an informant
18 USC 4 Federal Reporting Crime Act (whoever having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the united States, conceals and does not, as soon as possible, make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the united States shall be fined not more than $500.00 or imprisoned not more than three years or both).
28 USC 1343
28 USC 1443
42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, 1987 Civil Rights and Whistleblower case laws.18 USC 1927 Through 18 USC 1967 (RICO) Racketeering, Influence, Corruption, Organization Act
18 USC 1960, 1901, 1905, 1911, 1952, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964 (RICO)
Civil RICO
Continuous Criminal Enterprise Act (CCE)
18 USC 241 Conspiracy
18 USC 242 Conspiracy
18 USC 2383 Rebellion or Insurrection
18 USC 2384 Seditious Conspiracy
18 USC 1968 Civil Investigative Demand
Therefore, premises considered, this action is properly grounded in both jurisdiction and venue under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (F.R.Cr.P.)
WHEREFORE, premises considered and good cause having been shown that these allegations are in the public's interest, Plaintiff moves the Court to grant the convening of a Grand Jury at a specified time and place as the Court deemed proper so that Plaintiff and others may bring forth evidence to demonstrate that violations of the Laws of the united States of America have been violated and that Defendants are currently
Engaged in an Ongoing Continuous Enterprise and the Plaintiff and others lives are in danger of this filing.
Respectfully submitted,
December 9, 2002
Thank You.
Stewart Webb
Federal Whistleblower-Informant