Murdochs Hackers
National Security Threat Major Spy Scandal Suppressed
FOX News Breaking News Saturday July 9, 2011
Gordon Duff: Murdoch’s Hackers National Security Threat
Thursday, July 7th, 2011 | Posted by Gordon Duff
Murdoch’s Hackers National Security Threat
Major Spy Scandal Suppressed
Wiretapped: Police,
Security Agencies, Political Leaders, Military…and Some Other
Folks
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
A week or so ago, I was at a meeting with the intelligence
chief of a
major American
ally. With me were good friends, experts
in
counter-terrorism, surveillance and political intelligence, former top
level members of American “alphabet soup” agencies.
Nothing sinister was going on.
There was a problem to be addressed, very real
terrorism and a very real threat against a democratic
government.
The solutions involved training, technical support and the
use of highly
classified equipment.
This same equipment, these same capabilities are being used
in Britain, we were
told, against celebrities.
Then we found the parents of a poor dead
girl were victimized, the families of dead servicemen and,
finally,
police, government and security officials. What was uncovered was a
massive espionage operation using the world’s largest news
organization
as cover, an organization operating against every free government
in the
world.
What we found was a story that will never be told anywhere
but here.
Let’s take a
second and talk about “hacking.” You
don’t “hack” a mobile
telephone. You wiretap. This is a huge legal difference.
Both are illegal but wiretapping is far more serious.
When done in the name of “national security,” it is subject to
abuse and a huge threat to any
democratic system. When used by
others, it is called spying.
The case in Britain, reported by the criminals themselves,
yes, that’s right, the
newspapers
that were caught also own the news agencies that report the
news.
It goes further, the newspapers and
news agencies responsible for the “not so innocent” and “not so limited” spying
activities aren’t simply independent companies.
They are owned by Rupert Murdoch and operated as part of the
intelligence agencies of the State of Israel.
Murdoch, an Israeli, a fact not known to many, is the most
powerful media mogul in the world.
His corporations own,
not just Fox News, but networks, magazines, websites and
newspapers around the world, the biggest, the most scandalous, the
most
biased and the most politically extreme.
Thus far, one arrest is scheduled, a former reporter named
Andy Coulson.
Andy was supposed to be arrested in 2007 but was saved from
that unpleasant
fate and, instead, appointed Director of Communications for
Prime
Minister David Cameron.
Coulson resigned in January and is expected, according to Guardian
sources, to turn himself over to authorities tomorrow.
Murdoch and his Tel Aviv based associates believe tossing
Andy “under a bus”
will be enough.
After all, Murdoch’s empire has done more to rule Britain
than any government.
His publications don’t just blind the British people, they
go much further.
This isn’t about Britain at all, it is global politics on a
grand scale, showing its dirtiest
underwear to the public.
Murdoch’s worldwide media empire provides mechanisms for a
global Israeli
intelligence operation using their vast resources to control
governments, the United States, Britain, Germany, France, Greece, so
many governments.
Spying operations such as the one uncovered in
Britain are only a part of that
capability.
It isn’t just news but pop culture as well, used as a
weapon, a continual, unending assault on
reality, on perception, on truth.
Is Israel justified in going this far?
Is there a real danger to Israel?
Should we allow these abuses as we have for decades because,
as we hear every few minutes,
“(Nuclear) Israel is in danger of being pushed into the sea
by armies of Muslim fanatics.”
Let’s take a second and talk about an Israeli spy doing life
in prison.
His name is Jonathan Pollard.
He worked for the US Navy but spied for Israel.
Israel and American politicians ‘friendly’ to Israel demand
his release every year.
This is what his crimes are claimed to be:
Pollard stole information on Palestinian terror camps and
passed it on to Israel
Why then,with
the tremendous pressure the powerful Israeli lobby puts on the US,
does the US military and the various intelligence and law
enforcement
agencies insist Pollard die in prison?
The answer is simple.
What Israel and Barney Frank and friends say about Pollard’s
crimes is a lie.
This is what Pollard did:
At the height of the Cold War, Pollard accessed and passed
on this information:
NATO defense plans against a Soviet/Eastern Bloc attack Exact locations of all
American strategic nuclear forces Names of all American
intelligence agents and
assets operating in nations “unfriendly” to the United StatesTechnical plans for
advanced nuclear weapons and missile guidance systems Everything
else…
This information was given to Israel and directly transferred
to the
Soviet Union.
It is believed that tens of thousands of Russian Jews and
selected “others” were allowed to emigrate to Israel in
exchange.
Other considerations, financial in nature, were part of the
deal.
What did Pollard cost the United States?
Estimates indicate that 1,100 people died because of
Pollard,
tortured and executed or died in Soviet gulags.
These people were America’s “eyes and ears,” the heart of
our intelligence community
during the most dangerous period, thus far, in the history of the
world.
Billions of dollars of technology was transferred to the
Soviet Union, pushing
some of their defense sectors forward more than a decade.
Pollard nearly caused World War III.
This is why he is still in jail.
The “spin,” from Israel, from the Murdoch “press machine”
and from
Israel’s friends in congress, demands Pollard’s
release. Much of the
“leverage” behind this push, the
push toward an attack on Iran,
manipulation of American public opinion on Libya, on the Palestinian
issues and the other areas is likely from “information” gained by
illegal electronic eavesdropping, “wiretapping” done under the
guise of
“journalism.”
The “front” or “durable cover” for these spy activities is
“news.”
The ‘news,” of course, is “dirt” for scandal rags, not
really news at all.
The issue from a national security standpoint is that the
news
agencies themselves are directly affiliated with the same
intelligence
agencies tied to Pollard and now being tied to 9/11.
These “shadow” Israeli owned news agencies that we know as
Fox News
or the Wall Street Journal are part of a robust operational
capability,
intelligence gathering, propaganda and broad political infiltration.
The entire concept of “neocon” is
another expression of a partnership
between
the Israel lobby, Israeli run news organizations in the US and
right wing extremists responsible for looking the other way on
9/11, for
looking
the other way when the economy was looted, for looking the
other way when constitutional rights were suspended or elections
rigged
or phony wars planned and executed or when the United States
took over
Afghanistan in order to set up an opium farm to control 92%
of the
world’s heroin business.
Let’s talk eavesdropping.
Let’s talk about the equipment that Rupert Murdoch gets
for his reporters.
Back in that meeting with a national intelligence chief,
accessing
such equipment was on the table.
There were a couple of sources, one in Israel and one
elsewhere.
The equipment has legitimate counter-intelligence uses and
is available to police and intelligence
agencies.
These are systems that can wiretap mobile phones and text messages over
large areas.
One such piece of equipment manages “slave”
units, receiver and transmitter
units that can be used to intercept calls and messages over many miles and many
hundreds of phones.
This is how the equipment at this level, the things “reporters”
keep in their car in London, has to be demonstrated
and purchased:
The country purchasing this equipment sends technical
experts to a third country.
These experts enter the embassy of the producer nation and
the equipment is demonstrated.
It is then paid for in cash, some units cost up to $2.5
million each, and transferred to the
embassy
of the purchasing nation.
The units are then transferred to the end users by
diplomatic courier.
These things aren’t made in Britain.
They can’t be imported.
They can only be smuggled into the country,
the act of doing so is espionage.
The US has dozens of
these units.
They are with the CIA, NSA, Homeland Security and other such
organizations.
The use of these units under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act) was found to be illegal, a
violation of constitutional rights.
This is when used by the NSA, not by “reporters” or
“anti-defamation” groups.
When James O’Keefe of “Acorn” fame was picked up for
breaking into a
congresswoman’s office, one of these units was seized. O’Keefe was trained in Israel.
One of the services offered “Israel friendly” members of
congress,
other than a deluge of laundered drug money for their campaigns
is the
services of clandestine intelligence agents using highly classified
and
illegal surveillance equipment smuggled into the United States to
spy on
their
opponents.
These units are also used to spy on law enforcement
organizations, as
in
Britain, tasked with investigating political corruption.
This is called “counter-intelligence” by some. Others call it “perversion of
the course of justice.”
Remember, the spying on celeb’s is
the “cover.”
As long as you are intercepting
Tiger Wood’s text messages, you can spy on the FBI or
Special Branch all
day
long.
In Britain it went further, investigators at Scotland Yard
received
bribes to suppress the initial investigations.
If it went on there, it is going on here.
When the story was still being successfully managed as
“celeb phone
hacking” and not national security level espionage, the genie was
‘still in the bottle.’
Now we have another story but nobody we can trust to report
it,
nobody we can trust to investigate it, not in Britain and not in
the
United States.
What we have is simple.
Embassies are bringing in highly classified
and restricted equipment that can only legally be used by
security
agencies under strict supervision (ouch) and giving it to
“reporters.”
The fun and innocent side is celeb gossip.
The darkside, no longer speculation
involves spying and bribing police.
The real issues aren’t about news or celebs or even
torturing the families of murder
victims of dead soldiers.
The real story is spying, managing false flag terror cells
and outwitting police and
security agencies.
Here in the US, we call such actions a “clear and present
danger.”
These are acts of war.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of
their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml