Running
with a Bad Crowd
How Neil
Bush let himself get caught up in the
$1
billion Silverado debacle
Time
Magazine
October
1, 1990
Stew Webb
Federal Whistleblower
Contributor
to these articles
Rush for
Gold: How Silverado Operated August 13, 1990
http://www.stewwebb.com/Rush_for_Gold_How_Silverado_Operated_19900813.htm
Running
with a Bad Crowd October 1, 1990
http://www.stewwebb.com/Running_with_a_Bad_Crowd_19901001.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/Stew_Webb_Time_Magazine_Checks_1990.jpg
By Jonathan Beaty
Running
with a Bad Crowd
How Neil
Bush let himself get caught up in the
$1
billion Silverado debacle
October 1,
1990
Time
Magazine
By JONATHAN
BEATY DENVER
Was Neil
Bush a guileless victim of Denver's hard-charging
financial sharpies or a
willing accomplice?
In the view
of government regulators, Bush and 10 other
former directors and
officers of Denver's failed Silverado
Banking,
Savings and Loan are guilty of "gross negligence"
and should pay $200
million in restitution for contributing
to the S&L's
collapse. As the President's outgoing, personable
third son faces a separate
disciplinary hearing this week in a
Denver
courthouse, federal investigators will accuse him of
violating conflict-of-interest
regulations while serving as a
$12,000-a-year
Silverado director. The 35 year-old oilman
was widely perceived as
a mere pawn of manipulators bent
on cultivating
political protection from federal regulators.
Yet that
sympathetic view now seems to fall far short of the
full story.
A different portrait
of the likeable young Bush emerges from
Time
interviews with former Silverado executives and
real estate developers
with whom the S&L had cozy and
possible illegal dealings.
Citing Bush's M.B.A. from Tulane
University,
Denver insiders contend that he had to be aware
of his own
vulnerability to the go-go bankers and developers
with whom he dealt. More
significantly, they insist that Bush
did not fall innocently
into the clutches of the shrewd operators.
Bush, they
say, was as enthusiastic as Denver's highflyers in
arranging their financing of
his upstart. JNB oil company,
which he had the bad
timing to start just after the petroboom
had peaked.
The crafty
moneymen not only bought stock in Bush's company
and gave him a $100,000
loan he did not have to repay but
also consented to lavish
compensation that Bush awarded
himself from his failing
company. According to thrift and real
estate sources. Bush drew a
salary of $120,000 a year, earned
undisclosed bonuses and had a
comfortable expense account.
In the
lawsuit filed last week, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation
is trying to recoup some of the $1 billion that the
government spent to bail out
the failed Silverado.
"Our
conclusion is that Silverado was the victim of sophisticated
schemes and abuses by
insiders and of gross negligence by
its directors and
outside professionals," said Douglas Jones,
the FDIC's senior deputy
general council.
In the
Denver hearing this week, the Office of Thrift Supervision
aims to persuade an administrative-law
judge that Bush should
be banned in effect
from ever again serving on the board of a
financial institution. Bush
contends he is innocent of the charges,
in which he is accused
of failing to disclose his business
relationships with developers who
sought loans from Silverado.
Despite the
persistent spotlight on the President's son, the story
of Silverado's amazing
expansion and rapid demise illustrates
the broader evils behind
the S&L disaster.
It is a tale
of interlocking relationships and sweet deals among
S&Ls and
their bigger customers, the possible impact of political
contributions in delaying
crackdowns by regulators, even the
deceptive lure of junk bonds
and their king, Michael Milken.
It is not a
case history of nice guys being caught innocently
in an oil bust, as the
defunct thrift's managers often claim.
It is a
study in greed, deceit and profiteering.
In the
Silverado drama, Central Casting would have been hard
presses to come up with a
group of characters who better
personified the Roaring
Eighties:
MICHAEL
WISE. The
former Kansas clothing salesman became
the magnetic chairman of
Silverado and was considered for a top
S&L
regulatory position even as outside auditors were questioning
the integrity of
Silverado's loans.
KENNETH
GOOD
A charming and freewheeling huckster who made
and lost $1 million in
Texas real estate by the age of 26, he used
his high-wattage
personality and borrowing power at Silverado
to create a real estate
empire that gave him toys like his $10 million
mansion in Denver's ritzy
Cherry Hill. He ended up defaulting on
$30
million in loans from Silverado.
BILL
WALTERS.
Fueled in large part by loans from Silverado, the
aggressive Denver developer
built up a net worth of $100 million
and became chief of the city's
Chamber of Commerce. Then he too
left Silverado holding
the bag on nearly $100 million in bad loans.
LARRY
MIZEL.
The chairman of M.D.C. Holdings, a hugh
developer
that changed the Denver
skyline, he created and shuffled more than
100 front
companies as the need arose and used Silverado as his
personal piggy bank. The
politically powerful builder traded
undesirable land to Silverado in
exchange for hopeless loans so
the books of both would
look better to regulators.
These
operators were not on the scene in 1956 when Denver
builder Franklin Burns,
cashing in on the postwar housing boom
made possible by the GI
Bill, set up a friendly little thrift that
eventually became Mile High
Savings and Loan. He was doing
just what Congress had
envisioned when it carved out a role
for S&Ls in the
early 1930s. Limited by law to making home
loans and earning the
narrow profit margins provided stable
real estate market, Mile
High was helping propel the great
American
Dream of home ownership for everyone.
When the
small thrift ran into trouble during the inflationary
climate of the mid 1970s, it
was taken over by Denver businessman
James Metz,
who saw the sleepy S&L as the future flagship
of a financial empire.
He named himself chairman and hired
Wise, an
S&L marketing whiz from Columbia Savings in Kansas,
to run the company. The
nattily dressed Wise wasted no time
in transforming Mile
High's small-town image. He launched an
ambitious expansion drive,
unveiled plans for a glass-and-steel
headquarters downtown, and
renamed the company Silverado,
evoking the dreams of
prospectors in the days of the Wild West.
Silverado
was only the 26th largest S&L in the state, with total
assets of $56 million and
five offices, but it was ready to go places.
Propelled by
the oil shock of 1979, petroleum prices were
rocketing upward and providing
fuel for a ferocious building boom.
Wise to was ready to move. He was eager to shake the small-town
dust from his shoes and
gain entry to Denver's society.
One of his
first acts was to hire a public relations firm to burnish
his image and put a
speechwriter on the Silverado payroll.
"I
remember him standing up in white tie and tails and pledging
$100,000 of
Silverado's money to the Denver Symphony", recalls
an associate. Chuck
Henning, former executive director of the
Colorado
Savings & Loan League, notes that "Wise was image-
conscious and was going
through all the proper steps; he was
close to [federal
regulator] Kermit Mowbray, head of the
Home Loan
Bank Board in Topeka, and everybody figured he
was being groomed to
become president of the U.S. League
of Savings and Loan
Institutions."
The
self-assured Wise, who contributed handsomely to political
campaigns, enjoyed the support
of such influential officeholders
as Colorado's Democratic
Congressman Timothy Wirth, who
later graduated to the
Senate. Wise served two terms on the
board of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Topeka, which
regulates thrifts in the
region. He even served as chairman of
the regulatory policy
committee for the U.S. League, the most
influential S&L lobbying
group. Openly, the League poured
millions of dollars into
political campaigns through its PAC.
Says Edwin
Gray, former chairman of the Federal Home Loan
Bank Board:
"I don't think it would be stretching it to say Wise
controlled S&L policy and
the way the industry developed."
In the late
1970s and early '80s, thrifts were struggling under
the old rules because of
inflation. Forced to pay high rates
to attract deposits but
dependent on low-interest, long term
home loans for revenue,
the S&Ls saw their profits erode.
Under
constant pressure from thrift lobbyists,
the old rules were
felled on by one: in 1980 federal deposit
insurance was increased from
$40,000 to $100,000, money
brokers were allowed to
bundle massive deposits and thrifts
were freed to make
commercial loans.
Deregulation
coupled with federal insurance set Silverado loose
like a runaway
stagecoach. "Silverado began to take advantage
of that $100,000
insurance fast," says Hemming. Wise opened
an office that did
nothing more than generate new deposits by
telephone solicitation. He
advertised market-breaking high interest
rates called the Silverado
prime. But paying those rates meant
Silverado
had to get a higher return on loans. To do this, Wise
and Metz gradually moved
Silverado out of the home-loan market,
abandoning small local builders
and buyers in favor of big
depositors and even bigger
developers.
The energy
boom of the late 1970s and early '80s provided
Silverado
with plenty of opportunities for long-shot ventures with
big returns. "It
was a real Western boom that made the gold
and silver days look
pale by comparison," remembers Jim Thomas,
executive director of
Colorado's Independent Bankers Association.
"We
attracted all the con men, promoters, hucksters and sleaze
artists in sight."
Silverado's
officers had thrown prudent banking practices to the
wind, and before long the
S&L was locked into a constant seesaw
battle with regulators.
Says a former Silverado executive:
"They began
playing musical chairs with their auditors, and all
kinds of things were going
on between the federal regulators and
management because of the
dubious appraisals on property.
Silverado
would lend a developer $10 million, plus the money
he needed to pay the
interest on the loan, and then when the
developer came back in a year
after repaying nothing, they
would roll the whole loan
over and give him more money on top
to pay new fees and
interest. When inside auditors complained
about irregularities, they
[the auditors] were hushed up or let go.
Government
examiners had ample clues to what was going on.
But as David
Paul, Colorado's financial-services regulator, told a
congressional panel,
"Silverado spared no expense to convince
the regulators of their
prudence." Paul said Silverado had brought
"enormous management, consulting, accounting and legal
resources to bear to rebut
regulator's concerns." And the fast
talking Wise had the ear of Mowbray, the chief regulator in
Topeka, who
seemed to give Silverado the benefit of every doubt.
Wise was
well connected, and so were the real estate honchos
who were part of the
Silverado juggernaut: Walters, Good and
Mizel. Walters had his own
bank and a high profile as an
extravagant political
contributor. Mizel and his M.D.C. Holdings
dominated the Denver housing
market. He reinforced his clout
with hefty political
contributions to local, state and national
politicians. In 1986 he was host
at a luncheon attended by
President
Reagan and raised $1 million for the Republican Party.
One
explanation for Mizel's legendary fund-raising
abilities became
apparent only last month
after a Time story disclosed that M.D.C.
had pressured some of
its subcontractors into making personal
campaign contributions; the
developer then kicked the money
back to them by allowing
them to bill for phony construction work.
That
disclosure prompted dozens of contractors to admit that they
too had been pressured
by M.D.C. into making similar donations.
"We
were told that Mizel wanted to look good," said
a major
contractor who gave $40,000 to
various campaigns at M.D.C.'s
orders. "The money
came back to us from Lincoln Savings and
Silverado
."
This is the
world Neil Bush walked into when he went looking
for financial backing to
launch his own energy venture in the early
1980s. His
benefactors saw him coming. After working for a
couple years pursuing oil
and natural gas leases for Amoco
Production
Corp., the 26-year-old Bush decided he was ready
for bigger things. Neil
and his wife Sharon were welcomed as a
winsome couple in Denver's
highly stratified social set.
Sharon
volunteered to help at Children's Hospital. Denver's
most chic charity. She
sold cookies through Cookie Express,
a mini-business she
started with chum Nancy Davis Zarif,
daughter of Denver oil tycoon
Marvin Davis, who dominated
society in the city. Neil
played squash at the Denver Club.
But genteel
poverty amid rich friends pinched: with Neil's
$30,000
Amoco salary and a relatively modest $210,000 home,
the Bush's were not
keeping pace with their new friends.
Bush had
launched in 1982 with millionaire developer Walters,
the major stockholder in
Cherry Creek National Bank, to discuss
financial backing for JNB,
which Bush planned to launch with
partners James Judd and Evan
Nash.
Walters
quickly made $300,000 available to Bush to open JNB
in January 1983. This
enabled Bush to draw a more satisfying
salary of $60,000 and
provide generous operating expenses.
By August
the flamboyant Good was brought into the deal.
Bush had met
Good at one of the aggressive speculator's
lavish parties, and they
had become friends. Good opened
a $750,000 line of
credit for Bush, promised more and flashed
visions of wealth before his
new chum. He even lent Bush
$100,000
to invest in a hot commodities tip. The tip fizzled,
and Good forgave the
loan, an arrangement Bush later
acknowledged as
"fishy".
At another
Denver party Bush met Wise, who knew of Bush's
close ties to Walters and
Good. Silverado had underwritten
Good's
financial ventures with more than $35 million in loans.
Wise also
was involved in a complex of multimillion-dollar deals
with Walters, one of
Silverado's major stockholders and borrowers.
Wise called
up young Bush soon after the party, and they met for
breakfast at a pancake house,
where the bank executive offered
Bush a
directorship. Bush joined the board, despite his
acknowledged lack of experience.
"I think I was picked because
of my background in oil
and gas," Bush said later.
Within
months Bush was voting to approve more than $100 million
in loans to Walters,
but without disclosing to the rest of the board
his connections to the
developer. Another Office of Thrift
Supervision
conflict-of-interest charge against Bush is based on
a line of credit for a
Good-Bush oil venture in Argentina that the
young director proposed to
the board.
The problem:
Bush failed to inform his colleagues that he had
struck a series of deals
with Good under which the developer
would infuse JNB with $5
million in capital and combine the
company with Gulfstream Land
& Development, a $250 million
land venture in Florida
that Good was assembling.
To clear the
way for his Florida deal, Good asked the Silverado
board to accept a complex
restructuring of his debt and forgive
$11 million of
his loans and pledges in return for a $3 million
cash settlement.
The other
Silverado directors were apparently unaware that Good
had agreed to increase
Bush's JNB salary to $120,000 a year
and provide tax-free
bonuses, according to government records.
At about
that time, the developer had planned to make Bush a director
of his Florida company,
a post paying about $25,000 a year.
Bush
abstained from voting as Silverado's board approved the
windfall deal for Good in
November 1986, but regulators complained
that Bush had failed to
disclose that he was anticipating a hugh
investment from Good at a time
when his benefactor claimed he did
not have the money to
pay his full debt to the thrift.
That year,
alarmed federal and state regulators were undertaking a
special examination of
Silverado, and a concerned supervising
agent lectured the board
about insider deals. But at this point,
according to the Office of
Thrift Supervision, Bush was financially
dependent on Good. Bush had
received a $22,500 bonus and
new promises from Good
to indemnify Bush if he was called on
to pay old JNB debts he
owed to Cherry Creek National Bank.
As the
oil-driven bubble in the Energy Belt finally burst, the
relationship between Silverado
and some of its developers passed
from insider deals to
apparent fraud as both sides schemed to
keep each other afloat.
Silverado needed fresh capital because
it had so many
nonperforming loans. Major developers like M.D.C.
Holdings had
property that it could no longer develop.
So Silverado
began trading its bad loans to M.D.C. for it's sorry
property. Says a former
M.D.C. executive: "It was like Silverado
was telling M.D.C., 'I'm
going to trade you my dead cow for your
dead horse.'" After
keeping the bad loans on its books for a while,
M.D.C. would
sell them to a subsidiary, Home American Mortgage.
That firm in
turn pooled them in a real estate investment trust (REIT)
so it could peddle them
to other cooperating S&Ls.
Government
investigators are now probing a complex network of
companies and S&Ls that
invested deeply in junk bonds, mostly
handled by Drexel Burnham
Lambert, and carried out elaborate
deals to swap the bonds
and other assets.
Some of the
bonds were used to artificially shore up ailing thrifts
or were sold in
multimillion-dollar lots to cooperating S&Ls.
Federal
investigators are giving particular scrutiny to Silverado,
Charles
Keating's Lincoln S&L in California, CenTrust
Bank in
Miami, and San Jacinto
Savings in Texas. Each had extensive
business dealings with Drexel
and with one another.
Milken had
profitable discovered that S&Ls could use junk bonds in
two ways: to borrow
money for expansion and to invest money
for a high rate of
return. M.D.C.'s Mizel, hard pressed by the
economic downturn in Denver
and kept afloat by insider swaps
with Silverado, met the
junk-bond king in Manhattan and became
Milken's
enthusiastic client.
So too did
the influential Norman Brownstein, an M.D.C. board
member and Mizel's attorney, who lobbied in Washington in
favor of the use of junk
bonds by S&Ls.
In December
1986 Larry Mizel held a glitzy black-tie New Year's
Eve
party for his staff that was dubbed "resurrection night."
Milken had
raised more than $500 million for M.D.C. that year
by floating a junk
issue; a series of tricky swaps of land and debt
with Silverado had
swelled the apparent assets and profits of
both companies; and Bush
had been brought aboard at
Silverado. The future seemed
bright.
But two
private lawsuits, one on behalf of M.D.C. shareholders,
claim that the company's apparent
worth had been improperly
inflated by the phony
transactions with Silverado.
After this
sale, M.D.C. shares fell from $22 to below $1 for a time.
Many M.D.C.
officers and board members, including Brownstein,
mysteriously managed to sell much
of their personal M.D.C. stock
at its peak price. The
lawsuits also contend that Milken was the
architect of a scheme in which
M.D.C. sold junk bonds to
San Diego's
Imperial S&L, which eventually produced hugh losses
for the California
thrift.
By mid-1987,
despite the constant barrage of denials, inventive
legal interpretations and
outside expert opinions lofted by Wise
and his officers, state
and federal examiners had compiled a
disturbing account of Silverado
misdeeds. But Silverado seemed
to be leading a charmed
life: the thrift was merely warned about
its wayward banking
methods and allowed to keep operating.
Wise was the
fair-haired boy of the S&L industry, responsible for
targeting political
contributions and praised for his audacious
and inventive methods of
attracting deposits. Then too, the thrift's
biggest customers were major
political contributors.
Good donated
at least $100,000 to the Republican Party in 1988
after defaulting on his
huge Silverado loans.
"Good
walked away from tens of millions of dollars in financial
obligations, leaving taxpayers
to clean up the mess, but he could
find $100,000 to buy
influence with the Bush Administration,"
complained Colorado lawyer
Carlos Lucero, a former Democratic
candidate for the U.S. Senate.
M.D.C.s Mizel was even more active in fund raising.
Besides
organizing the Denver luncheon for President Reagan,
he directed a steady
stream of dollars to state and national
politicians, including Colorado
Governor Roy Romer, a Democrat,
Lawyer
Brownstein, nickname Mr. Fixit, was a top Democratic
rainmaker who arranged a
Denver fund raiser in 1987 for
Michigan
Senator Don Riegle; Riegle
is one of the Senators called
the Keating Five for
having received sizable contributions from
scandal-tarred head of Lincoln
Savings. Of $37,000 raised for
Riegle, $10,000 came from
16 people connected to Silverado
and M.D.C.
By this time
Silverado managers had little doubt about what was
coming, even though their
doors were still open. In January 1988
Wise asked
the board of directors, including Bush, to sign a letter
to the federal
regulators asking that Silverado's charter be amended
to they could take
advantage of a state law under which corporate
boards can exempt
themselves from personal liability if they are
found to have breached their
fiduciary duties.
By August
1988 neither regulatory forbearance nor political clout
could disguise Silverado's
woes: the company announced a
$200
million loss.
Wise began publicly looking for a buyer to bail
out the company.
Silverado was insolvent, and Bush glibly
announced that he was
resigning because his father had been
nominated as the Republican
presidential candidate.
On Oct. 24
the Colorado regulators notified their counterparts in
Topeka that
the hemorrhaging Silverado would be shut down
at the end of the
month.
Inexplicably,
Washington officials declined to go along.
Mowbray's Topeka office
relayed a message back to the Colorado
regulators: hold off for a
while. The day after George Bush
was elected, the Topeka office
started proceedings to shut
down Silverado.
The glaring
coincidence has never been officially explained.
Mowbray has said that he had
received a phone call
"from Washington" requesting the Silverado delay.
He claims
that he cannot remember who called.
M.Danny Wall, the chief
S&L regulator at the time, resolutely
denies accusations that the
delay was for political reasons.
But James Moroney, a former supervisory analyst with the bank
board in Topeka, has
declared publicly that concern about Neil
Bush "was
a material part of unconscionable delays in taking
over Silverado."
Colorado
state officials seized Silverado in December 1988 and
turned it over to federal
regulators, who reopened it as a reborn
Mile High
Federal S&L and later sold it to First Nationwide Savings
Bank,
a subsidiary of Ford Motor. Investigators are trying to track
the assets of the
high-living Walters and Good, who claim they
are broke. So far the
investigators have found 174 trust funds
linked to Good, who
apparently still has staunch friends in
Colorado.
The Denver Economic Development Agency has
just awarded a $100,000
development grant to Good Enterprises.
Neil Bush
explained that he had joined the Silverado board for
the "learning
experience."
But just
what he learned is not clear. After he folded JNB, he
opened yet another
oil-exploration firm, Apex Energy.
That firm
too is underwritten by silent backers.
And although
he has found no gushers yet, Bush was able to
purchase a $550,000 house in
one of Denver's best
neighborhoods last October.
The house is
in Sharon Bush's name, which is not unusual.
But also in
her name are a series of personal loans from Denver's
well-heeled Fred Vierra, president of United Artists Entertainment,
a cable-TV company.
The loans totaled $125,000 over the past
16 months.
No one is alleging that there is anything improper
about this borrowing, but
it strengthens the suspicion that despite
his painful ordeal, Neil
Bush has not learned his Silverado lessons
well enough. He seems
insensitive to his role as a member of
the nation's First
Family-----and to willing to rely on family
financial backers attracted by
his fathers fame rather than
by any business acumen
of his own.
END
All logos
and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE
NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. For more
information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml